Av. Gallagher et al., VEGETATION MANAGEMENT AND INTERRILL EROSION IN NO-TILL CORN FOLLOWINGALFALFA, Soil Science Society of America journal, 60(4), 1996, pp. 1217-1222
No-till corn (Zea mays L.) following alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is r
ecommended for reducing soil erosion; however, killing alfalfa in the
fall may result in insufficient crop residue cover for Conservation Co
mpliance soil erosion goals. We hypothesized that soil conservation ef
fectiveness was related to burn-down spray date and final harvest date
influence on cover. A Wisconsin held study to test this hypothesis in
cluded fall and spring burn-down spray dates in combination with eithe
r August or September final alfalfa harvests. Soils included Piano and
Saybrook silt loams (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Argiudolls) on 2
to 9% slopes and Palsgrove silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic H
apludalf) and Reedsburg silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Aquic Pale
udalf) on 7 to 14% slopes. Simulated rainfall (72 mm h(-1) for 1 h) wa
s applied following corn planting. The fall spray-September harvest QS
-SH) averaged 25% residue cover, measured after planting, with soil lo
ss of 257 g m(-2). The spring spray-August harvest (SS-AH) averaged 79
% residue cover and 24 g m(-2) soil loss. Of the 72 mm of rain applied
on each of the treatments, 34 mm ran off the two FS treatments, 23 mm
ran off the SS-SH treatments, and 19 mm ran off the SS-AH treatments.
Treatment runoff amounts and final infiltration rates related in part
to surface macroporosity and surface sealing. Fall herbicide applicat
ion resulted in too little residue cover to adequately reduce soil ero
sion.