C. Piersimoni et al., COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF 2 COMMERCIAL AMPLIFICATION ASSAYS FOR DIRECT-DETECTION OF MYCOBACTERIUM-TUBERCULOSIS COMPLEX IN RESPIRATORY SPECIMENS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(1), 1997, pp. 193-196
Two commercial assays detecting the presence of Mycobacterium tubercul
osis complex in clinical specimens by rRNA target amplification (Gen-P
robe Amplified M. tuberculosis Direct Test [AMTD]) and PCR (Amplicor)
were evaluated, The tests were applied to 327 digested, decontaminated
respiratory specimens collected from 236 patients, Results were compa
red with those of acid-fast staining and culture, The combination of c
ulture and clinical diagnosis was considered the ''gold standard.'' A
total of 60 specimens were collected from 27 patients with a diagnosis
of pulmonary tuberculosis, Thirteen of these specimens were from pati
ents receiving standard antituberculosis therapy and therefore were no
t included in the comparison, Of the remaining 47 specimens, 33 were s
mear positive, 40 were culture positive, 45 were AMTD positive, and 39
were Amplicor positive, After resolution of discrepant results, the o
verall sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predict
ive values were 77, 100, 100, and 95 for staining; 87, 100, 100, and 9
7.4 for culture; 95.9, 98.9, 94, and 99.2 for AMTD; and 85.4, 99.6, 97
.9, and 97.1 for Amplicor, respectively, Agreement between AMTD and Am
plicor assay results was 96.8%, It is concluded that although both nuc
leic acid amplification methods are rapid and specific for the detecti
on of M. tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens, AMTD appeared
to be more sensitive than Amplicor.