Oa. Ruano et al., REBUTTAL TO IN DEFENSE OF DIFFUSIONAL CREEP, Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials: properties, microstructure and processing, 211(1-2), 1996, pp. 66-71
Rebuttals to the recent criticisms of Burton and Reynolds and of Green
wood to our papers challenging the existence of diffusional creep are
presented and responses by us to the following specific areas are disc
ussed. (1) Denuded zones, universally to be considered direct evidence
for diffusional creep, are seen only under conditions where a high st
ress exponent (as opposed to a value of unity) is observed, indicating
that diffusion-controlled dislocation creep is the operative deformat
ion process. (2) The creep rate of fine-grained superplastic materials
is invariably orders of magnitude greater than predicted by diffusion
al creep; in these cases? the deformation process has been established
to be grain-boundary sliding accommodated by slip (GBS) rather than d
iffusional creep. (3) The creep behavior of fine-grained copper measur
ed by Burton and Greenwood can be described by a diffusion-controlled
dislocation creep mechanism at high stresses, by GBS at intermediate s
tresses, and by Hal per-Dorn creep at low stresses, with no clear evid
ence for diffusional creep.