Landscape ecologists often deal with aggregated data and multiscaled s
patial phenomena. Recognizing the sensitivity of the results of spatia
l analyses to the definition of units for which data are collected is
critical to characterizing landscapes with minimal bias and avoidance
of spurious relationships. We introduce and examine the effect of data
aggregation on analysis of landscape structure as exemplified through
what has become known, in the statistical and geographical literature
, as the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAW). The MAW applies to two s
eparate, but interrelated, problems with spatial data analysis. The fi
rst is the ''scale problem'', where the same set of areal data is aggr
egated into several sets of larger areal units, with each combination
leading to different data values and inferences. The second aspect of
the MAW is the ''zoning problem'', where a given set of areal units is
recombined into zones that are of the same size but located different
ly, again resulting in variation in data values and, consequently, dif
ferent conclusions. We conduct a series of spatial autocorrelation ana
lyses based on NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) to demons
trate how the MAW may affect the results of landscape analysis. We con
clude with a discussion of the broader-scale implications for the MAUP
in landscape ecology and suggest approaches for dealing with this iss
ue.