The biological integrity of stream ecosystems depends critically on hu
man activities that affect land use/cover along stream margins and pos
sibly throughout the catchment. We evaluated stream condition using an
Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) and a habitat index (HI), and compare
d these measures to landscape and riparian conditions assessed at diff
erent spatial scales in a largely agricultural Midwestern watershed. O
ur goal was to determine whether land use/cover was an effective predi
ctor of stream integrity, and if so, at what spatial scale. Twenty-thr
ee sites in first-through third-order headwater streams were surveyed
by electrofishing and site IBIs were calculated based on ten metrics o
f the fish collection. Habitat features were characterized through fie
ld observation, and site HIs calculated from nine instream and bank me
trics. Field surveys, aerial photograph interpretation, and geographic
information system (GIS) analyses provided assessments of forested la
nd and other vegetation covers at the local, reach, and regional (catc
hment) scales. The range of conditions among the 23 sites varied from
poor to very good based on IBI and KI scores, and habitat and fish ass
emblage measures were highly correlated. Stream biotic integrity and h
abitat quality were negatively correlated with the extent of agricultu
re and positively correlated with extent of wetlands and forest. Corre
lations were strongest at the catchment scale (IBI with % area as agri
culture, r(2) = 0.50, HI with agriculture, r(2) = 0.76), and tended to
become weak and non-significant at local scales. Local riparian veget
ation was a weak secondary predictor of stream integrity. In this wate
rshed, regional land use is the primary determinant of stream conditio
ns, able to overwhelm the ability of local site vegetation to support
high-quality habitat and biotic communities.