AUDITORY EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL (ERP) AND DIFFERENCE-WAVE TOPOGRAPHYIN SCHIZOPHRENIC-PATIENTS WITH WITHOUT ACTIVE HALLUCINATIONS AND DELUSIONS - A COMPARISON WITH YOUNG OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER (OCD) AND HEALTHY-SUBJECTS/
Rd. Oades et al., AUDITORY EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL (ERP) AND DIFFERENCE-WAVE TOPOGRAPHYIN SCHIZOPHRENIC-PATIENTS WITH WITHOUT ACTIVE HALLUCINATIONS AND DELUSIONS - A COMPARISON WITH YOUNG OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER (OCD) AND HEALTHY-SUBJECTS/, International journal of psychophysiology, 22(3), 1996, pp. 185-214
Event-related potentials (ERPS) in schizophrenics have been reported t
o show a reduced P3 on the left and less frontal mismatch negativity (
MMN). But the specificity of such findings to component, its locus, th
e type of eliciting event and patient group remains uncertain. Hence,
we examined ERP topography for P3, N2 and 3 precursor peaks according
to stimulus (3-tone oddball), attention condition (diffuse/focused) an
d four types of difference-waves. We contrasted 24 healthy and 13 OCD
subjects with schizophrenic patients with high versus low ratings of a
ctive delusions and hallucinations (12 paranoid-hallucinatory, PH; 12
nonparanoid, NP). P3 peaks were delayed and reduced in NP and PH group
s. Midline peaks were usual in focused attention and a right bias in d
iffuse attention. P3 responses to irrelevant standards remained latera
l in NP and small in OCD patients. All showed a small left and anterio
r bias in the P3-like peak in difference-waves. Mismatch negativity wa
veform (MMN) peaks shifted to the right in OCD, to both sides in PH an
d posteriorly in NP patients. Frontal processing negativity was biased
to the left (early) in NP and to the right (late) in PH groups. Early
peak topography reflected some later changes (e.g. PH and NP groups;
Pi-like peak, right bias absent; N1-like peak depressed and widely dis
tributed: NP group, P2-like peak smaller on the left). In OCD patients
, peak latencies were topographically undifferentiated (Pi, P2) or del
ayed (N2). The OCD group showed an unusual regional allocation of proc
essing effort. Before 200 ms frontocentral activity was more widesprea
d in PH and NP groups. Lateralization of negativity in target- and non
target-derived difference-waves may reflect differential disruption of
the frontal-temporal dialogue in registering important vs unimportant
features. NP patients, in particular, treated irrelevant stimuli anom
alously.