EFFECTS OF GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL HOUSING ON THE BEHAVIOR OF KENNELED DOGS IN ANIMAL SHELTERS

Citation
Pa. Mertens et J. Unshelm, EFFECTS OF GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL HOUSING ON THE BEHAVIOR OF KENNELED DOGS IN ANIMAL SHELTERS, Anthrozoos, 9(1), 1996, pp. 40-51
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Anthropology,"Environmental Studies
Journal title
ISSN journal
08927936
Volume
9
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
40 - 51
Database
ISI
SICI code
0892-7936(1996)9:1<40:EOGAIH>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
To emphasize the effects of group- and single housing of kennelled dog s, the behavior of 211 dogs in two German animal shelters was tested a nd observed. After being placed, 197 of the dogs' new owners were inte rviewed. Although 51% of the German animal shelters already keep dogs in groups, there is strong prejudice against group housing because of the fear of fights. This study demonstrates that this apprehension is unfounded. Ninety-one percent of the social confrontations between dog s housed together were settled by the use of behavioral rituals. Keepi ng dogs in groups, furthermore, leads to a significant reduction in no ise emission (p<.001). Group housing fulfills the dog's need for socia l interaction and the need to move. Dogs that were housed in groups di splayed a closer human-animal relationship (80%) than those that had b een kept individually (43%). A high percentage of individually housed dogs suffered from behavioral problems (31%) and 10% developed stereot ypes. The percentage of behaviorally disturbed dogs observed in group housing was 11%, and stereotyped forms of behavior did not occur. Dogs who had been kept in groups were, on average, placed within 10 days, and were returned to the animal shelter less often (9%) compared to th ose housed individually (25%). Dogs that were housed separately needed an average of 17 days to be placed. Even after being placed, there is a correlation between the animal shelter's type of housing and the do g's behaviour. Within four weeks after picking up their pet, 88% of th e owners of dogs that had been housed individually complained of probl ems compared to the owners of the dogs that had been kept in groups, 5 3% of whom were completely satisfied with the adoption. Despite the fa ct that these results might be influenced by the small number of shelt ers examined, the study leads to the conclusions that keeping dogs in groups is a suitable alternative for dog housing in animal shelters an d, for the animals' welfare, is preferable to individual housing.