D. Hands et al., COMPARISON OF METALWORKING FLUID MIST EXPOSURES FROM MACHINING WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF MACHINE ENCLOSURE, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal, 57(12), 1996, pp. 1173-1178
This research investigated the efficacy of machine enclosures in reduc
ing employee exposures to metalworking fluid mist. Four hundred fifty-
five personal samples from automotive machining and grinding operation
s collected over six years were divided into three groups based on the
type and extent of enclosure and local exhaust ventilation. The sampl
e groups were (1) machining equipment with original equipment manufact
urer (OEM) total enclosures and local exhaust ventilation, (2) machini
ng equipment with partial or retrofit enclosures and loca I exhaust ve
ntilation, and (3) machining equipment with little or no enclosure. Th
e results of the Mann Whitney U test of the three data sets indicated
that the employees operating equipment with OEM enclosures had signifi
cantly lower exposures than employees operating equipment that had eit
her of the other two control methods. There was no difference between
the exposures of operators of equipment with retrofit enclosures compa
red to operators of equipment without enclosures. The median exposure
for operators of equipment with OEM enclosures was 0.71 mg/m(3), about
half that found with the other two control methods. Each of the data
sets was compared to exposure criteria; 100% of the exposures associat
ed with OEM enclosures were below 1.0 mg/m(3), and 900/a of the exposu
res were below 0.5 mg/(3). The other two methods were not as effective
as OEM in reducing exposure to below these criteria. These results in
dicate that OEM enclosures provide the most effective control of metal
working fluid mist exposure.