Different types of evidence-palaeoecological, biogeographic and ethnog
raphic-currently provide different perspectives on the question of hun
ter-gatherer impacts on fire-sensitive components of northern Australi
an vegetation. Here I analyze the apparent discrepancies, using eviden
ce primarily from the Holocene. Using this more substantial body of ev
idence than is available for earlier periods, we can attempt to do jus
tice to both ecological and social complexity. While dry rainforest pa
tches and wet rainforest massifs need to be considered separately, eac
h experienced more human alteration in the late Holocene than the earl
y to mid-Holocene. In the former case, hunter-gatherer burning protect
ed dry rainforest from climatically induced changes in fire regime; in
the latter, it contributed to disturbance. Implications for future re
search into hunter-gatherer relations to land are discussed. This anal
ysis does not preclude the possibility of analogous changes having occ
urred during the Pleistocene.