Objective: To report the development of a referrer satisfaction measur
e. Method: Urban and rural general practitioners, physicians, neurolog
ists, as well as obstetricians and gynaecologists rated 36 items in te
rms of their judged importance to the respondent's satisfaction with a
psychiatric service, Responses of the whole sample and component prac
titioner sub-groups were ranked. Results: We established a high level
of agreement across the several subgroups suggesting that we had ident
ified general rather than idiosyncratic variables contributing to refe
rrer satisfaction, Referrers prioritised as most important the immedia
cy of initial appointment, the psychiatrist reporting at the beginning
and end of any treatment course, and ready verbal communication betwe
en the referrer and the psychiatrist, Items accorded low priority were
the psychiatrist's billing arrangements, the psychiatrist being 'perf
ect' (in either having a high 'cure' rate or making a definitive diagn
osis initially), or the psychiatrist taking complete responsibility fo
r difficult patients, A principal components analysis identified four
factors underpinning the item set, and we again established that score
s an these factors were not influenced by the particular referrer sub-
group. Conclusions: Such findings suggest that only minor modification
s would need to be made to the item set in developing a referrer satis
faction measure for quality assurance activities.