D. Kingdon et al., THE NOTTINGHAM STUDY OF NEUROTIC DISORDER - INFLUENCE OF COGNITIVE THERAPISTS ON OUTCOME, British Journal of Psychiatry, 169(1), 1996, pp. 93-97
Background. In previously published papers from the Nottingham Study o
f Neurotic Disorder a short treatment package of cognitive-behaviour t
herapy was no more effective than placebo drug treatment after 10 week
s' assessment in a cohort of 210 patients with neurotic disorders. Thi
s paper examines the outcome over two years of the patients treated by
cognitive-behaviour therapy separated into two therapist groups. thos
e who were competent in administering treatment and those of uncertain
competence. Method. The therapists (mainly community psychiatric nurs
es) of 70 patients with an original DSM-III diagnosis of either dysthy
mic, panic or generalised anxiety disorder were separated into two gro
ups on the basis of their perceived competence by their supervisor (DK
). Ratings of psychopathology were made at regular intervals over two
years by assessors blind to knowledge of treatment or therapist. Resul
ts. The patients treated by competent therapists (n=30) generally show
ed greater improvement than those allocated to therapists of uncertain
competence (n=40), mainly with respect to depressive symptoms, and th
e difference persisted over two years. long after the cognitive-behavi
our therapy had been completed. Conclusions. Cognitive-behaviour thera
py given by competent therapists over a 10 week period is of lasting b
enefit in neurotic disorder.