Although mutualisms are often viewed as fragile constructs, subject to
invasion by ''cheaters'' that gain from the mutualism without providi
ng compensating benefits, few studies have explored whether or not app
arent cheating behavior by one player actually denies benefits to the
other species. Panicled bluebells (Mertensia paniculata) experience hi
gh rates of nectar robbery by bumble bees (Bombus mixtus and B. frigid
us) in the Wrangell Mountains of southcentral Alaska. Nevertheless, ex
perimental prevention of nectar larceny in two seasons did not enhance
components of female reproductive success (nutlet initiation, seed-se
t, and seed mass) or male success (pollen removal). Observational data
show that the absence of a negative impact of nectar robbery is a con
sequence of bumble bee behaviors; the two bee species that rob mature
flowers buzz-pollinate the same flowers at an earlier stage in floral
development. The shift in bee behavior is driven by the presentation o
f different rewards at different times in the flowering period; young
flowers contain pollen and older flowers produce nectar. Although flow
ers typically receive and donate pollen before most nectar is produced
, the mature flowers producing a robbed nectar reward may nonetheless
contribute to the reproductive success of bluebell plants. Flowers seq
uestered from pollinators in the early stage were still capable of ini
tiating nutlets, demonstrating that older flowers can enhance female r
eproduction if pollinators are rare (when many early-stage flowers may
go unvisited). Moreover, the removal of mature flowers reduced the vi
sitation rate to early-stage flowers on the same plant. Because indivi
dual bumble bees switch frequently between nectar robbing and pollen c
ollection, the nectar reward in mature flowers may act as a key entice
ment to pollinators, which then enhance plant reproduction by legitima
tely visiting early-stage flowers. Rather than representing a case of
cheating behavior, nectar robbery may be an integral part of this plan
t-pollinator mutualism.