Gf. Quimby et al., BLADDER NECK RECONSTRUCTION - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF RECONSTRUCTION WITH OMENTUM AND SILICONE SHEATH, The Journal of urology, 156(2), 1996, pp. 629-632
Purpose: In 1986 we reported the placement of a silicone sheath sandwi
ched between layers of omentum around a newly reconstructed bladder ne
ck. We now present long-term followup of 94 cases of silicone sheath b
ladder neck reconstruction. Materials and Methods: A total of 94 silic
one sheaths was placed in 84 patients between August 1983 and October
1992. We retrospectively reviewed our results and divided the reconstr
uctions into 3 groups according to modifications in surgical technique
. We report the results of each modification and current recommendatio
ns for use. Results: Each sequential modification of silicone sheath b
ladder neck reconstruction significantly reduced the risk of erosion f
rom 100%, 32% and 7%, respectively (p <0.05). Erosion was independent
of patient age, sex, pathological condition or whether bladder neck re
construction was a repeat procedure. Patients who had silicone sheath
erosion did not have different continence or loss of urethral continui
ty than those with no erosion. In 13 patients (16%) artificial sphinct
er placement was clearly facilitated by the silicone sheath. Conclusio
ns: Modifications in the surgical technique of silicone sheath placeme
nt around a reconstructed bladder neck have resulted in a decrease in
the erosion rate to 7%. The primary benefit of silicone sheath placeme
nt is ease of subsequent sphincter placement. Currently we reserve sil
icone sheath placement for a small subset of patients who are most lik
ely to benefit from subsequent artificial sphincter placement.