Wb. Worthen et K. Rohde, NESTED SUBSET ANALYSES OF COLONIZATION-DOMINATED COMMUNITIES - METAZOAN ECTOPARASITES OF MARINE FISHES, Oikos, 75(3), 1996, pp. 471-478
Communities have a nested subset structure if the species comprising d
epauperate assemblages represent non-random subsets of progressively r
icher communities. Nestedness results from differential extinction pro
babilities, differential dispersal and colonization probabilities, nes
ted environmental tolerances, or facilitated succession. Previous rese
arch suggests that the frequency of significant nestedness, and the de
gree of nestedness as measured by a standardized index, C, should be g
reater for extinction-dominated communities than colonization-dominate
d communities. To test these hypotheses, we conducted nestedness analy
ses on 38 communities of metazoan gill and head ectoparasites infectin
g different species of marine fishes. Extinction, environmental tolera
nces and niche space, and interspecific interactions do not significan
tly influence the structure of these ectoparasite communities. As such
, they provide an appropriate system in which to examine the frequency
and degree of nestedness in colonization-dominated assemblages relati
ve to extinction-structured communities; Using two common analyses, we
found that nestedness in these ectoparasite communities was rare (1 o
f 38 communities after a conservative Bonferroni correction for multip
le comparisons). However, the mean standardized nestedness score (C =
0.483 +/- 0.243) was not significantly different from the mean nestedn
ess score of extinction-structured communities reported in the literat
ure. Therefore, although these communities do seem less nested than ex
tinction-dominated communities (from the frequency analysis), the C st
atistic is unable to distinguish these groups. Also, neither the frequ
ency of significant nestedness nor mean standardized C scores were rel
ated to mean water temperature, host habitat (benthic, pelagic, or ben
thopelagic), host trophic level (herbivore, planktivore, predator, or
omnivore), or whether or not the host is a schooling species. These re
sults confirm previous conclusions stating that these communities are
largely random, unstructured assemblages.