A critical survey of recent work on the ontological status of colors s
upports the conclusion that, while some accounts of color can plausibl
y be dismissed, no single account can yet be endorsed. Among the remai
ning options are certain forms of color realism according which famili
ar colors are instantiated by objects in our extra-cranial visual envi
ronment. Also still an option is color anti-realism, the view that fam
iliar colors are, at best, biologically adaptive fictions, instantiate
d nowhere. I argue that there is simply no fact of the matter as to wh
ich of these remaining options is correct. I blame this indeterminacy
on the fact that color vision exhibits several of the hallmarks of a m
odular input system, as described by Jerry Fodor in The Modularity of
Mind. Finally, I speculate that the range of live options falling with
in the scope of the indeterminacy may be even broader than initially i
ndicated.