A. Piga et al., ATTITUDES OF NON-ONCOLOGY PHYSICIANS DEALING WITH CANCER-PATIENTS - ASURVEY BASED ON CLINICAL SCENARIOS IN ANCONA PROVINCE, CENTRAL ITALY, Tumori, 82(5), 1996, pp. 423-429
Aims and Background: With this study we attempted to determine to what
extent recent acquisitions in clinical oncology had reached categorie
s of physicians involved in the management of patients with cancer, na
mely general surgeons, internists and family doctors. Methods: A quest
ionnaire was prepared with scenarios based on the following clinical s
ituations: Scenario A, Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer; Scenario B, T
reatment of small-cell lung cancer; Scenario C, Adjuvant therapy in hi
gh-risk, node-negative breast cancer; Scenario D, Treatment of early s
tage breast cancer; Scenario E, Asymptomatic transient myelosuppressio
n during chemotherapy. Questionnaires were mailed to 365 family doctor
s, 54 general surgeons and 61 internists of the Province of Ancona in
central Italy. Results: A total of 198 completed questionnaires were r
eturned (41%). Respondents were 36.7% of family doctors, 54.1% of inte
rnists and 57.4% of surgeons. Less than half of respondents selected a
n adequate approach such as adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer and
high-risk, node-negative breast cancer or chemotherapy as first-line
treatment for small-cell lung cancer. Conservative surgery plus radiot
herapy (QUART) for early stage breast cancer was indicated by 69% of r
espondents. Over three quarters of physicians would give treatment for
asymptomatic transient chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. In most of th
e scenarios, significant differences were detected in the distribution
of preferences according to category of physicians. Family doctors an
d young physicians (<40 years) generally performed worse than hospital
-based physicians (general surgeons and internists) and older physicia
ns. Conclusions: Non-oncology physicians showed insufficient awareness
of currently available knowledge in cancer treatment. Basic concepts
in cancer management should be part of the professional knowledge of a
ll medical doctors, and key advances in clinical oncology should sprea
d outside the oncologic environment more promptly, with a wide circula
tion among all physicians who care for cancer patients.