It is shown that, when conducting sequential testing of linkage in ped
igree samples, (1) type I and type II errors observed are less than ex
pected and (2) the generally accepted method for determining the avera
ge sample size, E(N), required for sequential analysis of linkage, und
erestimates it. A less biased approximation of E(N) is proposed. A wid
e scattering of actual sample sizes required for completion of sequent
ial analysis is demonstrated, which puts practical use of E(N) into qu
estion.