Ah. Messner et Ws. Crysdale, OTOPLASTY - CLINICAL PROTOCOL AND LONG-TERM RESULTS, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 122(7), 1996, pp. 773-777
Objective: To evaluate the long-term results after otoplasty on promin
ent ears. Design: Between 1988 and 1993, ear protrusion was measured p
reoperatively and postoperatively in pediatric patients undergoing oto
plasty by means of a standard protocol based on the Frankfort horizont
al line. Patients were asked to return for follow-up measurements a mi
nimum of 1 year after surgery. At the time of follow-up, a patient sat
isfaction survey was completed by the patients and their families. Set
ting: The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, a tertiary car
e children's hospital. Participants: Thirty-one of 51 patients returne
d for follow-up an average of 3.7 years after surgery. Results: One th
ird of ears returned to their original position, one third of ears sta
yed in a position equal to the immediate postoperative position, and o
ne third of ears had final positions between the preoperative and post
operative positions. At the superior rim, an average of 58% of the ope
rative medialization was lost. Good to excellent ear-to-ear symmetry w
as obtained in 78% of patients who returned for follow-up. Retrospecti
ve chart review showed a revision surgery rate of 3%; stitch granuloma
s were removed in 9% of patients. The patient satisfaction sun ey foun
d that 85% of patients were happy or very happy with their ears. Concl
usions: With time, a substantial loss of correction can be expected in
most (but not all) patients who undergo otoplasty particularly at the
upper pole. Overall, patients and their families are happy with the r
esults of otoplasty surgery.