FIELD-EVALUATION OF ARTHROPOD REPELLENTS, DEET AND A PIPERIDINE COMPOUND, AI3-37220, AGAINST ANOPHELES FUNESTUS AND ANOPHELES ARABIENSIS INWESTERN KENYA

Citation
Tw. Walker et al., FIELD-EVALUATION OF ARTHROPOD REPELLENTS, DEET AND A PIPERIDINE COMPOUND, AI3-37220, AGAINST ANOPHELES FUNESTUS AND ANOPHELES ARABIENSIS INWESTERN KENYA, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 12(2), 1996, pp. 172-176
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology
ISSN journal
8756971X
Volume
12
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Part
1
Pages
172 - 176
Database
ISI
SICI code
8756-971X(1996)12:2<172:FOARDA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
A field evaluation of the repellents N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (de er) and 1-(3-cyclohexen-1-yl-carbonyl)-2-methylpiperidine (AI3-37220, a piperidine compound) was conducted against Anopheles funestus and An . arabiensis in Kenya. Both repellents provided significantly more pro tection (P < 0.001) than the ethanol control. AI3-37220 was significan tly more effective (P < 0.001) than deet in repelling both species of mosquitoes. After 9 h, 0.1 mg/cm(2) of AI3-37220 provided 89.8% and 71 .1% protection against All. arabiensis and An. funestus, respectively. Deer provided >80% protection for only 3 h, and protection rapidly de creased after this rime to 60.2% and 35.1% for An. arabiensis and An. funestus, respectively, after 9 h. Anopheles funestus was significantl y less sensitive (P < 0.001) to both repellents than An. arabiensis. T he results of this study indicate chat AI3-37220 is more effective tha n deet in repelling anopheline mosquitoes in western Kenya.