Mg. Albano et al., AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF KNOWLEDGE LEVELS OF MEDICAL-STUDENTS -THE MAASTRICHT PROGRESS TEST, Medical education, 30(4), 1996, pp. 239-245
The increasing international mobility of medical students has inspired
the search for an international assessment format. As one step along
this line, kinetics of knowledge acquisition and final cognitive level
s of students were compared among one Dutch, one German and four Itali
an medical faculties. For this comparison, the Maastricht Progress Tes
t (MPT) was used. For four out of the six participating faculties, it
was possible to compare the level of knowledge of sixth-year students.
These data showed no significant differences on the test as a whole.
On the other hand, as judged from cross-sectional data on students fro
m all study years, the kinetics of knowledge acquisition showed differ
ent trends. In one school applying problem-based learning, acquisition
of knowledge by students occurred almost linearly. In another school,
over the first 2 years, acquisition of knowledge occurred only in the
basic sciences but not in clinical or public health/behavioural scien
ces. In two other schools over that same period, students seemed to ga
in no knowledge at all. In some faculties, a marked boost in knowledge
was noted with third- or fourth-year students. These findings may be
explained by peculiarities of the respective curricula, selection of s
tudents during their studies, and national or local assessment procedu
res. It is preliminarily concluded that the different educational appr
oaches and assessment systems in medical education in Europe seem to h
ave only limited influence on the final level of knowledge of the grad
uates. On the other hand, these differences may influence the kinetics
of knowledge acquisition, especially in distinct domains like basic o
r clinical sciences. Therefore, the MPT may not be suitabe to solve th
e problem of assessment of individual international exchange students,
but it may be helpful in identifying corresponding cognitive levels o
n, for example, basic sciences for students in different curricula.