This paper describes an experiment at the University of Western Austra
lia (UWA) medical curriculum, in which the focus of the 1 week of face
-to-face teaching in public health in the 3-year clinical rotation was
changed from important health problems affecting whole communities to
one emphasizing the use of epidemiological principles to enhance doct
ors' decisionmaking. The students are now left to choose the clinical
subject matter, and instead of being presented with predetermined read
ings selected by the teaching staff, the students have assumed respons
ibility for discovering the latest relevant information on the topics
they choose and of presenting this to the class. The teacher now spend
s much less time in front of the class, providing only mini-tutorials
each day on presenting to small groups, and on the skills required to
understand the published literature on the aspects of the diagnosis, i
nvestigation, management and prognosis of individual patients. The top
ics chosen by students for exploration differ little, either in terms
of the nature of the health problems concerned or the epidemiological
principles at issue, from those covered previously when the programme
was set entirely by the staff. However, attendance at the course has i
mproved sharply, the short time between mini-tutorials and application
of the material they cover has increased the perceived relevance of t
he teaching, and feedback collected systematically from successive cla
sses of students has been very positive. Any anxiety on the part of th
e staff at relinquishing control of the curriculum has proved unfounde
d while the new programme has much to recommend it as a model of self-
directed learning.