Data from seven contexts (gender history, dichotomized bitterness, lin
ks between assertions and proofs, dramatizing facts, malpractice and o
ther legal actions, therapists' own history of abuse, and therapists'
experience of recovered memories) are presented and their implications
explored. The data support the thesis that individuals, the professio
n, science, and society suffer when research findings, clinical interv
entions, and public policy are taken out of these seven contexts. Even
otherwise reliable facts, theories, laws, and practices can become di
storted, misleading, and, ultimately, harmful.