Bl. Vanbrussel et al., DIFFERENT CLINICAL OUTCOME IN CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS WITH SINGLE AND SEQUENTIAL VEIN GRAFTS - A 15-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 112(1), 1996, pp. 69-78
Objective: In trying to answer the question about the controversial us
e of sequential grafts, we determined the long-term clinical outcome o
f patients in whom coronary artery bypass was done with different type
s of vein grafts, Methods: A total of 428 consecutive patients who und
erwent isolated coronary artery bypass with vein grabs between April 1
, 1976, and April 1, 1977, were prospectively observed, In these patie
nts three groups could be defined with single grafts only, sequential
grafts only, and combined single and sequential grafts, Follow-up was
99.8% complete and averaged 15.4 years for the survivors, The Kaplan-M
eier method and multivariate analysis done with the Cox regression mod
el were used for survival, myocardial infarction, reintervention, and
''any event.'' Results: Perioperative mortality and perioperative myoc
ardial infarction rate were not statistically different among the thre
e groups, During follow-up more myocardial infarctions (hazard ratio:
2.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 3.93; p = 0.0293) or any events
(hazard ratio: 1.54; 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 2.36; p = 0.045
0) occurred in patients with sequential grafts only than in patients w
ith single grafts only, Conclusion: Although more complete revasculari
zation was obtained in patients with sequential vein grafts only, more
events during a W-year follow-up occurred in these patients than in p
atients with single vein grafts only.