INDUCIBLE EXPRESSION OF BETA(1)-ADRENERGIC AND BETA(2)-ADRENERGIC RECEPTORS IN RAT C-6 GLIOMA-CELLS - FUNCTIONAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLOSELY-RELATED SUBTYPES
Hy. Zhong et al., INDUCIBLE EXPRESSION OF BETA(1)-ADRENERGIC AND BETA(2)-ADRENERGIC RECEPTORS IN RAT C-6 GLIOMA-CELLS - FUNCTIONAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLOSELY-RELATED SUBTYPES, Molecular pharmacology, 50(1), 1996, pp. 175-184
We examined the role of beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (AR)
density and ratio in catecholamine-stimulated cAMP responses in rat C-
6 glioma cells. These cells, which normally express both subtypes, wer
e stably transfected with an isopropylthio-beta-D-galactoside-inducibl
e vector containing either beta(1)AR or beta(2)AR coding sequences, an
d receptor expression was controlled by the time and concentration of
isopropylthio-beta-D-galactoside exposure. Induction of the dominant b
eta(1)AR subtype increased the potencies of isoproterenol (ISO) and ot
her agonists in stimulating cAMP accumulation by 20-40-fold without ch
anging maximal response. Induction of beta(2)AR expression caused 7-13
-fold increases in the potency of lSO, epinephrine, and zinterol, but
not of norepinephrine, and a 20-40% loss in maximal response to all ag
onists. Selective antagonists showed that both subtypes contributed in
a nonadditive manner in the response to ISO under different condition
s. After beta(2)AR induction, the effects of ISO were not blocked by t
he beta(1)-selective antagonist CGP 20712A but were shifted 100-fold t
o the right by the beta(2)-selective antagonist ICI 118,551. However,
in the presence of ICI 118,551, CGP 20712A caused an additional 100-fo
ld decrease in ISO potency, and Schild analysis revealed complex inter
actions between the two subtypes. Each antagonist alone caused smaller
shifts to the right in the dose-response curve to NE and, when presen
t simultaneously, completely abolished the NE response, We conclude th
at beta(1)ARs and beta(2)ARs have different efficiencies in activating
cAMP accumulation in C-6 glioma cells. Activation of coexisting subty
pes results in complex and sometimes synergistic interactions between
the two subtypes, which vary with agonist concentration, selectivity,
subtype density, and ratio.