Purpose: To assess visual outcome in four groups: one multifocal intra
ocular lens (IOL), one monofocal IOL, and two phakic, one older and on
e younger. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, National Health Servi
ce, Puerta de Hierro University Clinic, Madrid, Spain. Methods: This p
rospective study comprised 70 aphakic eyes, 42 with a multifocal and 2
8 with a monofocal IOL, and 42 phakic eyes, 21 older than 60 years and
21 younger than 60 years. The phakic groups served as a double contro
l. Main outcome measures were corrected and uncorrected distance and n
ear visual acuities, contrast and glare sensitivity, and clinical and
subjective complications.Results: There were no significant difference
s between the monofocal and multifocal IOL groups in uncorrected or co
rrected distance Visual acuity. Near visual acuity in the multifocal g
roup, with and without distance correction, was significantly better t
han in the monofocal group. Near vision with addition was similar betw
een the two IOL groups. There were no significant differences between
the monofocal and multifocal IOL groups in contrast sensitivity at the
96 and 50% thresholds. Between-group differences of less than one Beg
an line were found at the 25 and 11% thresholds. The phakic groups had
better contrast sensitivity. The older phakic group's results were cl
oser to those of the IOL groups. There were no significant complicatio
ns. Conclusion: Distance acuity and contrast sensitivity were similar
in the monofocal and multifocal IOL groups; however, the multifocal gr
oup had significantly better near acuity. The younger phakic group had
significantly better contrast sensitivity than the other groups.