CONTINUOUS THORACIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA VERSUS COMBINED SPINAL THORACIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA ON PAIN, PULMONARY-FUNCTION AND THE METABOLIC RESPONSE FOLLOWING COLONIC RESECTION/
Nb. Scott et al., CONTINUOUS THORACIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA VERSUS COMBINED SPINAL THORACIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA ON PAIN, PULMONARY-FUNCTION AND THE METABOLIC RESPONSE FOLLOWING COLONIC RESECTION/, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 40(6), 1996, pp. 691-696
Background: The neuroendocrine response following major surgery has no
t been previously influenced by either regional anaesthetic techniques
or opioid analgesia probably due to insufficient intraoperative affer
ent neural blockade. In this study we attempted to determine whether s
ignificant inhibition of these pathways could be achieved by combining
preoperative high spinal anaesthesia with postoperative thoracic epid
ural anaesthesia. In theory too, there may be additional benefits over
perioperative thoracic epidural anaesthesia on pain and pulmonary dys
function. Methods: 20 ASA 1-3 patients undergoing elective colonic sur
gery were studied. Gp 1 (n=10) received a high spinal intraoperative b
lock to T4 using 6mls of 0.5% bupivacaine plus continuous epidural 0.1
25% bupivacaine/0.0025% diamorphine. Gp 2 (n=10) patients received epi
dural 0.5% bupivacaine block to T4 plus continuous epidural infusion o
f 0.125% bupivacaine/0.0025% diamorphine. We measured a) plasma glucos
e and cortisol at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 h; b) forced vital capacity
(FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and peak fl
ow rate (PFR) preoperatively, at 8 and 24 h; c) visual analogue pain s
cores (VAS 0-10) at rest, cough and mobilisation at 8 and 24 h; d) blo
ck height every hour for 12 hows then 3 hourly; e) 24-hour urine volum
es for dopamine, adrenaline and noradrenaline f) 24-hour PCA morphine
requirements. Results: The two groups did not differ in age, sex, heig
ht, weight, duration of surgery, blood loss or serum albumin. Pain rel
ief was excellent and similar in both groups. The average 24 hour morp
hine consumption was 10 mg in both groups with no differences in the b
lock height. All the patients had a 30-50% reduction in FEV1, FVC and
PFR (P>0.05). Metabolically, there was no statistical difference betwe
en the 2 groups except a higher rise in glucose in Gp1 at 2 and 3 h (P
=0.0312 and 0.014). 24-hour catecholamine studies showed no difference
s for noradrenaline (P=0.8), adrenaline (P=0.47) and dopamine (P=0.36)
. Conclusions: Thoracic epidural bupivacaine/diamorphine infusion prov
ided excellent postoperative analgesia following colonic surgery. An i
ntraoperative combined spinal/epidural technique conferred no addition
al benefit on analgesia, pulmonary function and the neuroendocrine res
ponse.