O. Nordstrom et al., LOCAL-ANESTHESIA AND PROPOFOL-FENTANYL SEDATION FOR CAROTID-ARTERY SURGERY, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 40(6), 1996, pp. 724-728
Background: In patients undergoing carotid artery surgery with local a
naesthesia (LA), a sedative/analgesic pharmacological supplement is ap
propriate in most cases in order to provide comfort. This adjunct shou
ld not preclude continuous clinical neurological monitoring. The aim w
as to investigate if a combination of fentanyl and propofol to supplem
ent LA would provide comfort for the patient, allow continuous clinica
l neurological monitoring and absence of difficulties for the anaesthe
tist, and good conditions for surgery, including insertion of a shunt
if this should become necessary. Methods: During a 1-year period low d
oses of propofol and fentanyl were used to supplement LA in 36 cases o
f carotid artery surgery in 34 consecutive patients. A shunt tvas only
used if neurological dysfunction occurred. Data on haemodynamics, pul
monary gas exchange, clinical neurological monitoring and subjective o
pinions from patients, surgeons and anaesthetists were obtained. Morbi
dity within 30 days was documented. Results: Conversion to general ana
esthesia was undertaken in one patient;previously operated on the same
artery, who became unconscious due to a stroke during manipulation of
the artery before arteriotomy. No other adverse outcome was found wit
hin 30 days. In the remaining 35 cases the procedures were carried out
under LA. Stump pressures below 50 mmHg were found in 17/35 cases. In
traoperative neurological dysfunction was detected in 10/35 cases (stu
mp pressures between 23 and 60 mmHg). Shunting was easily performed, a
nd rapidly relieved the neurologic symptoms in all these patients. Int
raoperative respiratory and haemodynamic control was satisfactory. Eas
e of performance, including clinical neurological monitoring, was ackn
owledged by both anaesthetists and surgeons, and all 33 patients (35 o
perations) who were accessible for a postoperative interview stated th
at they would prefer the same regimen in the case of further surgery.
Conclusion: The number of cases in this open uncontrolled study does n
ot permit an evaluation of this anaesthetic and sedative technique in
terms of neurological and cardiac outcome. Thus, we simply want to inf
orm about our positive experiences regarding patient acceptance and ea
se of performance in all relevant respects when fentanyl and propofol
are used to supplement LA for carotid artery surgery.