We have assessed the value of using a simple apparatus, the Carpal Box
, in patients with suspected scaphoid fracture, to produce elongated a
nd magnified radiographs of the carpus. The interobserver agreement be
tween 60 observers of standard scaphoid radiographs and longitudinal a
nd transverse Carpal Box radiographs (X-CB) was compared in 11 patient
s. Three-phase bone scanning was used as a comparative standard, If at
least 75% of the observers agreed and the result was confirmed by thr
ee-phase bone scanning, the outcome was termed reliable,Scaphoid radio
graphs and the longitudinal X-CB films were reliable in four patients
and the transverse X-CB films in six patients. The bone scan suggested
a scaphoid fracture in five of the 11 patients. Agreement in the inte
rpretation of the standard scaphoid radiographs was acceptable in only
36% of patients: in interpretation of transverse Carpal Box radiograp
hs this figure increased to 55%.