Ge. Woodman et al., ACUTE ETHANOL INTOXICATION AND ENDOTOXEMIA AFTER TRAUMA, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 41(1), 1996, pp. 61-71
To determine actions of acute intoxication on pathophysiologic respons
es to trauma, anesthetized and ventilated mongrel pigs received a 20%
solution of ethanol (EtOH) by an intravenous (IV group; 2 g/kg, n = 8)
or an oral (PO group; 3 g/kg, n = 12 x 60 minutes) route of administr
ation, or the lactated Ringer's vehicle (LR group; n = 12), After 60 m
inutes, all were subjected to soft tissue injury and 30 to 35% hemorrh
age, 60-minute shock, and then resuscitation, with shed blood plus sup
plemental LR, After 3 days, host defense was challenged with Escherich
ia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS); (1 mu g/kg x 30-minutes IV), The sup
plemental resuscitation was identical (50-53 ml/kg/hours), but posttra
umatic acidosis was observed in the IV group and the PO group (base de
ficit = 4.4 +/- 1.3 and 5.5 +/- 0.9 mEq/L) and not in the LR group, Af
ter 3 days, the acid-base equilibrium was restored, but a difference i
n host defense was unmasked by LPS, In the LR group, LPS-evoked pulmon
ary vasoconstriction was followed by decreased compliance and ventilat
ion-perfusion mismatch, which was associated at 3 to 5 hours with a ba
se deficit, reduced Svo(2), and reduced Po-2 (-0.5 +/- 0.2 mEq/L, 46 /- 1%, 127 +/- 1 mm Hg). These changes were blunted in the PO group (2
.0 +/- 0.1 mEq/L, 56 +/- 1%, 183 +/- 4 mm Hg) and potentiated in the I
V group (-4.3 +/- 0.5 mEq/L, 40 +/- 2%, 60 +/- 2 mm Hg), even though m
ore fluid was required to maintain systemic arterial and cardiac filli
ng pressures following LPS administration in the IV (40 +/- 6 mL/kg/ho
urs) versus the LR or PO groups (31 +/- 5 or 23 +/- 3). The PO versus
LR differences could not be attributed to enteral nutrition because an
isocaloric solution of 50% dextrose had no effect versus LR solution,
EtOH caused neutropenia following trauma, relative to LR solution, bu
t the IV versus PO differences could not be discriminated on the basis
of neutrophil or lymphocytes counts, nor CD18 receptor expression, no
r renal or hepatic dysfunction. However, T4 lymphocytes and cortisol,
a nonspecific index of inflammation, were higher for at least 24 hours
after trauma with IV, relative to PO or LR. Blood EtOH was similar wi
th IV or PO during resuscitation (100-120 mg/dL), but the kinetics wer
e different prior to trauma, With PO, blood EtOH slowly accumulated to
a steady state plateau, the level of which was higher with no anesthe
sia or no trauma, With IV, blood EtOH peaked at 275 mg/dL and then exp
onentially declined with a rate that was not influenced to a major ext
ent by trauma or by anesthesia, Therefore: 1) EtOH absorption is impai
red during trauma (in part because of reduced gut blood flow); 2) acut
e EtOH intoxication at the time of trauma altered neutrophils, plasma
cortisol, and T4 lymphocytes during recovery and host defense to a sup
erimposed LPS challenge, The apparently favorable effect of PO versus
IV EtOH on the response to endotoxemia after trauma probably reflects
differences in the kinetics of blood EtOH in the interval before reper
fusion, but a ''first pass'' effect (metabolism in the gut or liver) m
ight also explain the data.