An. Mamelak et al., PREDICTING SURVIVAL FROM HEAD TRAUMA 24 HOURS AFTER INJURY - A PRACTICAL METHOD WITH THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 41(1), 1996, pp. 91-99
Objective: To develop a method to predict long-term outcome after head
injury and determine if outcome can be accurately predicted 24 hours
after injury. Design: A retrospective review was performed on a study
cohort of 672 head-injured patients admitted in coma (Glascow Coma Sca
le score less than or equal to 8) who remained comatose for at least 6
hours, survived more than 24 hours, and had 6-month outcome data avai
lable, Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to determine whi
ch clinical variables predicted 6-month outcome, Statistically signifi
cant clinical predictors were combined into a single examination varia
ble (MPX score), which reflected a rank-ordering of examinations from
worst to best, which was then further weighted by patient age, The rel
ation between 6-month outcome and MPX score at admission and 24 hours
was plotted and analyzed. Measurement and Main Results: Age, best moto
r score, and pupillary reactivity at admission and 24 hours were signi
ficant predictors of outcome; extraocular motility was predictive at 2
4 hours only, Age was the most important independent predictor, follow
ed by best motor score, pupillary reactivity, and extraocular motility
, Combining these predictors into MPX score resulted in a set of graph
s that reliably predicted long-term outcome, The 24-hour MPX data were
better predictors of 6-month outcome and were more specific in predic
ting negative outcomes than admission data, Conclusions: The method is
simple to use, relying on bedside neurologic examination and a single
graph, but appears to predict long-term outcome accurately as early a
s 24 hours after head injury, If validated on other large series of pa
tients, this method could provide an objective and practical basis for
terminating care in patients unlikely to survive a head injury.