The ultimate aim in treating hypertension is to reduce cardiovascular
mortality and morbidity, especially from coronary heart disease and st
rokes. In several long-term trials this goal has been achieved with an
tihypertensive therapy in the form of diuretics. Subsequently, diureti
cs and betablockers, compared as single agents or with the addition of
other agents, did not appear to affect overall cardiovascular morbidi
ty and mortality differentially. Therefore, recommended first-line the
rapy for hypertension was initially diuretics, followed later by beta-
blockers as alternatives. Recently, calcium antagonists and ACE inhibi
tors have been accepted as equally valuable in the treatment of hypert
ension because they similarly lower blood pressure, lack any adverse m
etabolic effects and may be more beneficial than diuretics or beta-blo
ckers on the long-term prognosis of hypertensive patients. Such recomm
endations are, however, highly speculative and are not supported by tr
ials using cardiovascular mortality and morbidity as endpoints. In ord
er to solve the conflict between proven facts and sound theory, long-t
erm trials comparing older (mainly diuretics) and newer (calcium antag
onists, ACE inhibitors, alpha-adrenoceptor blockers) antihypertensive
agents are needed. Until such trials are completed, the debate surroun
ding first-line drugs for antihypertensive treatment will nor be resol
ved.