A COMPARISON OF THE REACTIONS OF PPH(2)CH(2)SR (R=ME, PH) WITH ALKYNE-BRIDGED DICOBALT CARBONYL-COMPLEXES AND WITH AN IRON DICOBALT MU(3)-THIOXO CARBONYL COMPLEX
Aj. Edwards et al., A COMPARISON OF THE REACTIONS OF PPH(2)CH(2)SR (R=ME, PH) WITH ALKYNE-BRIDGED DICOBALT CARBONYL-COMPLEXES AND WITH AN IRON DICOBALT MU(3)-THIOXO CARBONYL COMPLEX, Journal of organometallic chemistry, 519(1-2), 1996, pp. 243-252
The reactions of Ph(2)PCH(2)SR (R = Me, Ph) in toluene with the dicoba
lt complexes [Co-2(mu-R(1)CCR(2))(CO)(6)] (R(1) = R(2) = CO(2)Me and R
(1) = H, R(2) = CO(2)Me) give the monosubstituted complexes [Co-2(mu-R
(1)CCR(2))(CO)(5)PPh(2)CH(2)SMe] 1 and [CO2(mu-R(1)CCR(2))(CO)(5)PPh(2
)CH(2)SPh] 2. On heating 1 and 2 in toluene solution, loss of CO leads
to the bridged species [Co-2(mu-R(1)CCR(2))(mu-PPh(2)CH(2)SMe)(CO)(4)
] 3 and [Co-2(mu-R(1)CCR(2))(mu-PPh(2)CH(2)SPh)(CO)(4)] 4. This transf
ormation is readily reversed by treatment of 3 and 4 with CO, showing
the Co-S bond in these complexes to be relatively weak. Similar reacti
ons of Ph(2)PCH(2)SR (R = Me, Ph) with [Co2Fe(mu(3)-S)(CO)(9)], howeve
r, give only the ligand bridged species [Co2Fe(mu(3)-S)(mu-Ph(2)PCH(2)
SR)(Co)(7)] (R = Me 5 and R = Ph 6). Treatment of 5 and 6 with CO caus
es cleavage of the Co-S bond but, in contrast to 3 and 4, the ligand b
ridged species readily reform when the CO purge ceases. The structures
of 3a and 6 have been confirmed by single-crystal X-ray analysis.