INFLUENCE OF AMINOPHYLLINE AND STRYCHNINE ON THE PROTECTIVE ACTIVITY OF EXCITATORY AMINO-ACID ANTAGONISTS AGAINST MAXIMAL ELECTROSHOCK-INDUCED CONVULSIONS IN MICE
P. Tutka et al., INFLUENCE OF AMINOPHYLLINE AND STRYCHNINE ON THE PROTECTIVE ACTIVITY OF EXCITATORY AMINO-ACID ANTAGONISTS AGAINST MAXIMAL ELECTROSHOCK-INDUCED CONVULSIONS IN MICE, Journal of neural transmission, 103(3), 1996, pp. 307-314
Aminophylline reversed the protective action of both, (2-carboxypipera
zine-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic acid (D-CPP-ene - a competitive NMD
A antagonist) and valproate (used as a conventional antiepileptic drug
for comparative purposes) against maximal electroshock-induced seizur
es. The respective ED(50) values of aminophylline were 55.7 and 98.4 m
g/kg i.p. However, aminophylline (up to 100 mg/kg i.p.) did not influe
nce the protective efficacy of -4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-ben
zodiazepine (GYKI 52466 - a non-NMDA antagonist). Strychnine affected
the protection provided by D-CPP-ene, GYKI 52466, and valproate agains
t maximal electroshock - the ED(50) values of strychnine for the rever
sal of the anticonvulsive effects of D-CPP-ene, GYKI 52466 or valproat
e were 0.082, 0.35 and 0.28 mg/kg s.c., respectively. An involvement o
f strychnine sensitive glycinergic receptor-mediated events in the mec
hanism of the anticonvulsive activity of excitatory amino acid antagon
ists and valproate may be postulated. The ineffectiveness of aminophyl
line to reduce the anticonvulsive effects of GYKI 52466 may distinguis
h a new class of antiepileptic drugs offering an advantage over conven
tional antiepileptics in patients with epilepsy, requiring aminophylli
ne for pulmonary reasons.