A. Wahba et al., FLUID THERAPY WITH RINGERS SOLUTION VERSUS HAEMACCEL FOLLOWING CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 40(10), 1996, pp. 1227-1233
Background: Crystalloid and colloid infusion can be used in volume the
rapy following heart surgery. In this prospective, randomised study we
compared Ringer's solution (group R) to Haemaccel (group H) following
coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: A stringent protocol for ad
justing the infusion rate was used. Haemodynamic parameters and pulmon
ary function were evaluated as well as chest tube drainage. The double
-indicator dilution method was used to measure total blood volume inde
x (TBVI), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) and extravascular l
ung water index (EVLWI). Results: Haemodynamic stability was achieved
in both groups throughout the study period, as judged from mean arteri
al pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressu
re, and cardiac index. However, the total volume infused was significa
ntly higher in group R. TBVI and ITBV were higher in group H, although
only significant at 8 h for TBVI. Pulmonary function was similar in b
oth groups. There was no significant difference in EVLWI, pulmonary sh
unt fraction, and time on mechanical ventilation. Likewise, chest tube
drainage was not significantly different in both groups. Conclusion:
We conclude that volume therapy with Haemaccel following heart surgery
requires less volume and achieves better filling of the circulation c
ompared to Ringer's solution. (C) Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
40 (1996)