DO WE EVALUATE OUTCOME APPROPRIATELY

Citation
X. Beristain et al., DO WE EVALUATE OUTCOME APPROPRIATELY, Neurological research, 18(3), 1996, pp. 248-250
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Clinical Neurology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01616412
Volume
18
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
248 - 250
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6412(1996)18:3<248:DWEOA>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
We discuss two different ways of measuring outcome in a sample of 20 p atients who had intracranial aneurysm surgery. Patients were evaluated at discharge using the Karnofsky Scale and the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Six months after discharge we conducted a neuropsychiatric evaluation including cognitive, behavioral, and mood status assessment Although 13 of our patients had a 'good recovery' 18 had some neuropsychiatric impairment. We did not find statistical relationships between the disc harge evaluation and the neuropsychiatric assessment at follow-up. We discuss the need for developing new outcome measures to pick-up neurop sychiatric deficits, beyond the traditional neurologic semiology.