Ji. Sandlow et Kj. Kreder, A CHANGE IN PRACTICE - CURRENT UROLOGIC PRACTICE IN RESPONSE TO REPORTS CONCERNING VASECTOMY AND PROSTATE-CANCER, Fertility and sterility, 66(2), 1996, pp. 281-284
Objective: To examine the practice patterns of urologists performing v
asectomy in response to studies reporting an increased risk of prostat
e cancer in vasectomized men. Design: A mailed survey. Setting: A univ
ersity medical institution. Participants: One thousand five hundred ra
ndomly selected United States urologists under the age of 65 years. Ma
in Outcome Measure: Urologists reported practice patterns of vasectomy
in response to studies showing possible link between vasectomy and pr
ostate cancer.Results: A response rate of 51% (759/1,500) was obtained
. Although > 90% state that these studies have had little or no effect
upon their practice of vasectomy, 27% screen vasectomized men earlier
for prostate cancer, and 20% would be reluctant to recommend a vasect
omy to a man with a strong family history of prostate cancer. Conclusi
ons: Over one fourth of urologists who screen for prostate cancer have
altered their screening patterns even though they responded that the
studies have not affected their practice patterns.