Cl. Griffiths et Dw. Klumpp, RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SIZE, MANTLE AREA AND ZOOXANTHELLAE NUMBERS IN 5 SPECIES OF GIANT CLAM (TRIDACNIDAE), Marine ecology. Progress series, 137(1-3), 1996, pp. 139-147
Relationships between body size and both projected mantle area and num
bers of symbiotic zooxanthellae were calculated for 5 species of giant
clam from the Great Barrier Reef. Parameters were closely correlated
in all species, but the allometry of the relationships differed marked
ly between clam species. Mantle areas were consistently lowest in Trid
acna derasa. T. crocea and Hippopus hippopus had the largest mantles a
t small body size (2 cm), but because of slow length-related increment
s were soon overtaken by T. gigas and T. squamosa, the latter developi
ng a mantle area double that of other species at 30 cm length. Similar
allometric variations were evident in zooxanthellae numbers. At small
size these were much lower in T. squamosa and T. gigas than in H. hip
popus, T. crocea or especially T. derasa; but by 30 cm length T. squam
osa and T. gigas had the largest zooxanthellae populations. When expre
ssed per unit body mass zooxanthellae numbers declined rapidly with si
ze in all species. The rate of decline was most marked in T. crocea, t
his being a function of its rapid length-related increment in flesh ma
ss. This is probably the main factor restricting T. crocea to small te
rminal body size. By contrast, rapid length-related increments in mant
le area and zooxanthellae numbers in both T. gigas and T. squamosa app
ear to favour the large body size and rapid growth observed in these s
pecies. The reason why T. squamosa is unable to realize the rapid grow
th and enormous terminal size observed in T. gigas is obscure, but may
be a function of the relative reproductive output of these species, w
hich remains unquantified.