Jk. Ramage et al., IMAGING SECONDARY NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS OF THE LIVER - COMPARISON OF I-123 METAIODOBENZYLGUANIDINE (MIBG) AND IN-111-LABELED OCTREOTIDE (OCTREOSCAN), Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 89(7), 1996, pp. 539-542
Functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumours with Octreoscan and I-123
-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is important for assessment prior to v
arious therapies and assessing response. The two imaging methods have
not been directly compared in hepatic neuroendocrine tumours. Patients
(n=18) were studied with both imaging techniques. The sensitivity of
Octreoscan was 94%, and that of MIBG 39%. No previously occult primary
sites were detected. Concurrent octreotide therapy did not reduce the
sensitivity of Octreoscan. Widespread bone metastases were seen in tw
o post-liver-transplant patients using Octreoscan. Octreoscan is a sen
sitive means of detecting hepatic neuroendocrine tumours, and the more
specific technique. MIBG has poor sensitivity, reducing its clinical
utility. Therapy with I-131 MIBG is likely to be applicable to relativ
ely few patients.