A basic but largely neglected issue in research on the reliability of
children's testimony is the impact of certain questioning tactics (e.g
., use of legalese and socioemotional intimidation) on the accuracy of
children's reports,ln the present study, 5- to 7-year-old children we
re interviewed about a standardized play event with free-recall cues a
nd detailed questions that were specific or misleading. Linguistic com
plexity of questions (complex or simple) and socioemotional context of
interview (supportive or intimidating) were varied between subjects.
Results indicated that children were significantly less accurate in re
porting the event when questioned with complex, developmentally inappr
opriate questions rather than simple questions, yet children rarely vo
iced their comprehension failures. In addition, children interviewed b
y a warm, supportive interviewer were more resistant to misleading que
stions about the event than were children interviewed in an intimidati
ng manner Theoretical interpretations and implications for investigati
ve interviewing and policy are discussed.