This paper grapples with the crucial question of how to affirm the pos
itioning of female subjectivity in light of contemporary critiques of
the subject. This involves a critical engagement with Derrida's decons
truction. First, I interrogate his use of metaphors of femininity and
the figure of 'Woman', its inherent masculinism and its relation (if a
ny) to 'real life' women. Then, drawing on the work of Gayatri Spivak
and Diane Elam, I consider the political implications of deconstructio
n's undecidability. I argue that a politics of indeterminancy does not
necessarily preclude political action or ethical judgements but rathe
r in fact demands them. Finally I consider issues of nominalism and fo
rmalism. Engaging with the work of Linda Alcoff and Teresa de Lauretis
I argue that deconstruction is not purely formalist. It provides us w
ith a means to understanding the production of gendered subjectivity.