This cross-sectional study explored gay men's sexual risk behavior fro
m the perspective of three popular conceptual models, the health belie
f model, the theory of reasoned action, and social cognitive theory. D
ata were collected from sexually active gay men via anonymous question
naire containing questions about sexual behavior and items related to
the constructs comprising the three models. Using structural equation
modeling techniques (LISREL 8), self-reported condom use was examined
from the perspective of each theory. The results suggested that a subs
tantial part of the variance in unprotected anal intercourse could be
explained by conceptually analogous constructs common to these models.
These constructs referred to the cognitive-affective reactions toward
condoms and to the social context of using condoms. An additional var
iable unique to social cognitive theory, self-efficacy, added to the e
xplained variance in the criterion above and beyond the variables that
were common to the models. Relevant variables from the three theories
were integrated into an expanded self-efficacy model.