Ml. Kowalski et al., INTRANASAL CHALLENGE WITH ASPIRIN INDUCES CELL INFLUX AND ACTIVATION OF EOSINOPHILS AND MAST-CELLS IN NASAL SECRETIONS OF ASA-SENSITIVE PATIENTS, Clinical and experimental allergy, 26(7), 1996, pp. 807-814
Background Although the mechanism of aspirin-sensitivity seems to be r
elated to inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase by aspirin (ASA), the chain of
biochemical events leading to the ASA-induced adverse reaction is not
clear, and the contribution of particular mediators and inflammatory
cells has not been elucidated. Objectives To investigate the involveme
nt of secretory, vascular and cellular mechanisms in the pathophysiolo
gy of nasal reactions to aspirin. Methods Six patients with ASA-sensit
ive asthma/rhinosinusitis and seven ASA-tolerant patients were challen
ged intranasaly with saline and lysine-acetylsalicylic acid (Lys-ASA)
12 mg, on separate occasions. Nasal lavages were obtained before, and
then every 15 min after challenges, and analysed for biochemical and c
ellular composition. Results Lys-ASA challenge caused rhinorrhoea, sne
ezing and nasal congestion with parallel increases in total protein an
d albumin concentration, albumin % and lysozyme activity in the nasal
secretions of ASA-sensitive patients. Concomitant with clinical sympto
ms, an influx of leucocytes into nasal secretions occurred with signif
icant enrichment in eosinophils (mean prechallenge: 24 +/- 12%, postsa
line 27 +/- 9%, postLys-ASA 51 +/- 10%; P < 0.03). The influx of eosin
ophils into nasal secretions was associated with a remarkable increase
in Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP) immunoreactivity in five of six
patients (mean 9.3 +/- 3.8 mu g/L and 140.9 +/- 45.8 mu g/mL before an
d after Lys-ASA, respectively). At the peak of ASA-induced symptoms an
increase in the tryptase level was also observed in five of six patie
nts (mean prechallenge: 2 +/- 0.1 U/L; postLys-ASA 16 +/- 5 U/L; P < 0
.01) suggesting activation of mucosal mast cells. In ASA-tolerant pati
ents Lys-ASA did not induce significant symptoms or changes in the bio
chemical and cellular composition of nasal secretions. Conclusion The
results show that the ASA-induced nasal adverse reaction involves chan
ges in vascular permeability and serous cell secretion. Both activated
eosinophils and mast cells may contribute to the pathophysiology of t
he ASA-induced reaction in the nasal mucosa.