Jh. Kim et al., TRANSCRIPTIONAL EFFECTS OF SUPERINFECTION IN HIV CHRONICALLY INFECTEDT-CELLS - STUDIES IN DUALLY INFECTED CLONES, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes and human retrovirology, 12(4), 1996, pp. 329-342
We had previously shown that chronically infected ACH-2 cells (HIVLAI)
could be superinfected with HIVRF, that the frequency of superinfecti
on increased with time, and that the transcription of the superinfecti
ng virus exceeded that of the host HIVLAI provirus. In contrast, ACH-2
cells superinfected with a nef-substituted neomycin-resistant (proNEO
) provirus were not detectable by DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
until geneticin (G418) was added, suggesting that the ability to propa
gate progressively in culture may be HIV strain specific. Clonal popul
ations of ACH-2 superinfected with proNEO did not demonstrate preferen
tial transcription of the superinfecting virus. However, clones of ACH
-2 superinfected with HIVRF (ACH2/RF) showed a preponderance of HIVRF
transcripts similar to that seen in bulk populations. Induction of the
superinfecting virus by phorbol ester (PMA) occurred more rapidly tha
n the host provirus and did not equalize transcriptional activity. PCR
-derived long terminal repeat (LTR) fragments and Tat cDNAs from A3.01
cells acutely infected with HIVRF or from ACH-2 cells were sequenced
and tested for transactivation. The HIVLAI LTR was two to three times
more Tat-responsive than the HIVRF LTR. Tat(RF) was two to three times
more transcriptionally active on either LTR than Tat(LAI). Demethylat
ion with 5-azacytidine did not significantly affect HIV expression fro
m the HIVLAI host provirus of superinfected ACH2/RF cell clones. These
data suggest that the mechanism of preferential transcription in HIVR
F superinfected ACH2/RF may be attributed to the Tat/TAR axis and the
effect of the specific locus of host proviral integration.