The authors discuss presuppositions of classical plant morphology and
point out the difficulties of classical (classificatory) typology (bas
ed on typical forms that are mutually exclusive, categories such as sh
oot, root, leaf, or trichome), which have been known for a long time.
It is shown how these difficulties can be overcome by a more open morp
hology concept that is continuous and dynamic. Furthermore, it is poin
ted out that such an approach works through an appropriate methodology
based on principal components analysis and a decomposition of the pla
nt into nested morphological articulations.