EVALUATION OF BULK MILK ANALYSES OF ACETONE, UREA, AND THE FAT-LACTOSE-QUOTIENT AS DIAGNOSTIC AIDS IN PREVENTIVE VETERINARY-MEDICINE

Citation
A. Steen et al., EVALUATION OF BULK MILK ANALYSES OF ACETONE, UREA, AND THE FAT-LACTOSE-QUOTIENT AS DIAGNOSTIC AIDS IN PREVENTIVE VETERINARY-MEDICINE, Journal of veterinary medicine. Series A, 43(5), 1996, pp. 261-269
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Sciences
ISSN journal
0931184X
Volume
43
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
261 - 269
Database
ISI
SICI code
0931-184X(1996)43:5<261:EOBMAO>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of additional aceton e and urea analyses to the established milk quality system (protein, f at, lactose, and somatic cell count) in bulk milk samples twice a mont h. Samples were obtained from 44/93 herds in a lowland/highland area. When ranging herds with most acetone values over 0.24 mmol/l (90th per centile), only two out of 10 herds would be on a corresponding list wh en ranged for highest ketosis treatment incidence. Most high acetone v alues occur after periods with concentrated calvings, but also in peri ods without calvings, presumably because of feeding with inferior sila ge high in butyric acid. Milk fat concentration, milk lactose concentr ation and the interaction term between these, the fat-lactose-quotient , show the largest absolute values in all three models with ketosis tr eatment incidence, milk protein concentration, and milk yield as depen dent variables in general linear analyses on standardized variables. A cetone and urea concentrations in bulk milk show only small absolute v alues or are omitted from the models. The practical conclusion from th ese analyses on bulk milk samples to be used by advisory personnel is small, but it seems that high bulk milk fat concentrations and low lac tose concentrations are unfavourable when it comes to ketosis treatmen t incidence, but favourable when it comes to milk protein concentratio n. Bulk milk acetone concentrations as a measure of the energy supply in herds must only be interpreted after calving intensity and silage q uality are assessed.