POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF IN CHILDREN FOLLOWING EXTRACTION OF CARIOUSDECIDUOUS TEETH UNDER GENERAL-ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON OF NALBUPHINEAND DICLOFENAC
Ih. Littlejohn et al., POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF IN CHILDREN FOLLOWING EXTRACTION OF CARIOUSDECIDUOUS TEETH UNDER GENERAL-ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON OF NALBUPHINEAND DICLOFENAC, European journal of anaesthesiology, 13(4), 1996, pp. 359-363
In a randomized double-blind study 60 children, undergoing the extract
ion of carious deciduous teeth under day-case general anaesthesia, wer
e assigned to receive either intravenous nalbuphine hydrochloride 0.3
mg kg(-1) (n=21), one or more diclofenac suppositories 12.5 mg to a do
se of 1-2 mg kg(-1) (n=19), or no analgesia (n=20). The duration of an
aesthesia was longer in the diclofenac group (9.6 min, SD 3.5) compare
d with control (7.2 min, SD 2.6) and nalbuphine (6.9 min, SD 3.0) grou
ps respectively (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant diff
erences in post-operative pain scores during the 45 min postoperative
period studied between the three groups using an objective pain score.
We conclude that using this methodology we were unable to demonstrate
any statistically significant differences between the analgesic effec
ts of either intravenous (i.v.) nalbuphine or diclofenac suppositories
compared with control.