J. Nijs et al., RECENT IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SCREENPRINTING TECHNOLOGY AND COMPARISON WITH THE BURIED CONTACT TECHNOLOGY BY 2D-SIMULATION, Solar energy materials and solar cells, 41-2, 1996, pp. 101-117
Recently, a lot of progress has been made in the pilot-production of m
ono- and multicrystalline silicon solar cells by the screenprinting te
chnology. For example, a process based on screenprinting combined with
oxide passivation and a plasma-nitride ARC yields cell efficiencies a
pproaching 17% on 100 cm(2) Cz-Si material. These results ask for a de
tailed comparison concerning the relative performance of state-of-the-
art screenprinted cells compared to the state-of-the-art buried contac
t structure. This is done by means of 2D-simulations using the simulat
ion program SIMUL. It comes out that the efficiency difference between
a buried contact technology and a screenprinting technology, both wit
h selective emitter and good surface passivation, is only 0.5% absolut
e. The efficiency difference between screenprinted cells with a homoge
neous emitter and buried contact cells with a selective emitter turns
out to be between 1 and 1.5% absolute, depending on the surface passiv
ation quality. Looking at the above-mentioned difference in efficiency
, only detailed cost calculations for an industrial production scenari
o can reveal which process leads to the lowest cost per Wp.