Risk homeostasis theory (RHT) suggests that changes made to the intrin
sic risk of environments are negated in one of three ways: behavioural
adjustments within the environment, mode migration, and avoidance of
the physical risk. To date, this three-way model of RHT has little emp
irical support, whilst research findings on RHT have at times been dia
metrically opposed. A reconciliation of apparently opposing findings m
ight be possible by suggesting that extrinsic compensation fails to re
store previously existing levels of actual risk in cases where behavio
ural adjustments within the environment are incapable of negating intr
insic risk changes. This paper reports a study in which behavioural ad
justments within the physical risk-taking environment are capable of r
econciling target with actual risk. The results provide positive suppo
rt for RHT in the form of overcompensation for the intrinsic risk chan
ge on specific driver behaviours. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science
Ltd