K. Parham et al., RESPONSES OF AUDITORY-NERVE FIBERS OF THE UNANESTHETIZED DECEREBRATE CAT TO CLICK PAIRS AS SIMULATED ECHOES, Journal of neurophysiology, 76(1), 1996, pp. 17-29
1. To elucidate the peripheral contribution to ''echo'' processing in
the auditory system, we examined the characteristics of auditory nerve
responses to click-pair stimuli in unanesthetized, decerebrate cats.
We used equilevel click pairs at peak levels of 45, 65, and 85 dB SPL
re 20 mu Pa. The interclick intervals ranged from 1 to 32 ms. This stu
dy reports results from 78 auditory nerve fibers in 7 cats. The fibers
were divided into 2 groups: 33 low- and 45 high-spontaneous rate (SR)
, with SRs less than and greater than or equal to 20 spikes/s, respect
ively. A method was introduced to quantify the second-click response,
and its recovery was examined as a function of the interclick interval
. 2. In general, auditory nerve fibers showed a gradual recovery of th
e second-click response as interclick interval was increased. Noticeab
le differences in the second-click response recovery functions emerged
among fiber populations that were related to the SR. Low-SR fibers sh
owed Little change in the recovery functions of the second-click respo
nse as the click level was increased from 45 to 85 dB SPL. In contrast
, high-SR fibers showed slower recoveries with increasing click level
from 45 to 85 dB SPL. At 45 and 65 dB SPL, the recovery functions of t
he two SR groups were similar. At 85 dB SPL, high-SR fibers exhibited
slower recovery than low-SR fibers, regardless of fiber characteristic
frequency. The interclick intervals at 50% second-click response rang
ed from 1 to 6 ms (mean, 1.4 ms) among low-SR fibers. The interclick i
ntervals at 50% second-click response for high-SR fibers, whereas simi
lar to those for the low-SR fibers at 45 and 65 dB SPL, ranged from 2
to 16 ms (mean, 3 ms) for high-SR fibers, at 85 dB SPL. 3. We also exa
mined auditory nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) evoked by click
-pair stimuli for various interclick intervals and click levels. With
increasing interclick interval, the amplitude of the second-click CAP
increased, and with increasing level, the second-click CAP showed slow
er recovery. At 45 dB SPL, the recovery functions of the second-click
CAP were similar to those of the high- and low-SR fibers. At higher le
vels, the CAP exhibited lower second-click response values than both h
igh- and low-SR fiber populations for interclick intervals <4-8 ms. At
85 dB SPL, as interclick interval increased, between 8 and 16 ms, the
CAP second-click response converged with that of the high-SR fibers,
and by 32 ms, the second-click response values were similar for the CA
P, high- and low-SR fibers. 4. The present results are consistent with
those of forward masking studies at the level of the auditory nerve i
n that both demonstrate a short-term reduction of the neural responses
. However, the two results differ in that we observed that high-SR fib
ers exhibited slower recovery than low-SR fibers in response to click-
pair stimuli, opposite of the trend observed in the forward masking st
udies of responses to pure-tone bursts. 5. The present results on audi
tory nerve fiber responses to click-pair stimuli provide a reference f
or comparison with responses of central auditory neurons to similar st
imuli. This information should serve to elucidate the peripheral contr
ibution to the processing of echoes in the auditory system.