Purpose: The aim of this study was comparing the cardiac mass in elder
ly normotensive subjects and elderly white-coat hypertensive patients
by examining in perspective, in consecutive patients, office blood pre
ssure (BP), ambulatory BP, and echocardiographically determined left v
entricular mass. Patients and methods: We studied 42 elderly patients
attending a hypertension unit: of these, 22 (mean age 68.7 +/- 3.2 yea
rs) had persistent >90 mm Hg office diastolic blood pressure (DBP), >1
40 mm Hg systolic blood pressure (SEP) and <142/90 mm Hg daytime ambul
atory BP (white-coat positives); the remaining 20 (mean age 67.4+/-2.2
years) had <90 mm Hg office DBP, <140 mm Hg SEP and <142/90 mm Hg day
time ambulatory BP (normotensives). White coat-patients (n=22) were se
lected from a series of 75 consecutive newly diagnosed and never treat
ed patients with mild hypertension (casual DBP constantly between 90 m
m Hg and 105 mm Hg). Results: Neither left ventricular mass index (89.
9 +/- 23.1vs 91.8 +/- 25.4 P=NS and +/- 25.4 P=NS) and left ventricula
r mass/height, (115.4+/-17.1 vs 119.6+/-18.3 P=NS), nor relative wall
thickness (0.31+/-0.44 vs 0.33+/-0.05 P=NS) were significantly higher
in white-coat hypertensives as against normotensives. Neither did we f
ind a relevant difference between left atrial diameters in the above c
onsidered groups (3.28+/-0.41 vs 3.32+/-0.37). In fact 81.8% of white-
coat hypertensives had left ventricular normal geometry; whilst 13.6%
only had concentric remodeling. Age and sex were associated with left
ventricular mass index, left ventricular mass/height and wall thicknes
s. Multiple regression analysis revealed that it is ambulatory, not of
fice BP that carries independent information about relative wall thick
ness and left ventricular mass indices.Conclusions: Since elderly whit
e-coat hypertensive subjects did not display a greater cardiac involve
ment than age-matched normotensives, they should be treated as such.